Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Academic Differences

6.5.3     Undergraduate common grading scheme (CGS) and common numerical scheme (CNS)
 
For all Modules Comprising the General Degree and the Bachelor’s Degree and Semester Modules at Level 8 and Below
For Honours Degree and Modules at
Levels 9 and 10
Grade
(Appearing On University Record)
Common Numerical Scheme
Equivalent to an outstanding
(high) first class honours
1A
18-20*
ExcellentClear (middle) first class honours
1B
17
 Low first class honours
1C
16
    
 High upper second class
2A
15
Very GoodMid upper second class
2B
14
 Lower upper second class
2C
13
    
 High lower second class
2D
12
GoodMid lower second class
2E
11
 Low lower second class
2F
10
    
 High third class
3A
9
PassMid third class
3B
8
 Low third class
3C
7
    
Fail, MarginalFail, Marginal
4A
6
  
4B
5
  
4C
4
    
Clear FailClear Fail
5A
3
  
5B
2
  
5C
1
    
No Grade 
X
0

* The CNS value 19 is used for a 1A annotated with one star, and 20 for two stars. Module outcomes and all University and school regulations are expressed solely in terms of the CGS. The CNS is for use only within undergraduate modules.
6.5.4 Undergraduate assessment grade descriptors
For all modules comprising the General and Bachelor’s degree and semester modules at Level 8 and belowFor Honours Degree and Modules at levels 9 and 10CGS GradeCommon Numerical SchemeDescriptors for attainment of Intended Learning Outcomes
ExcellentOutstanding (high) first class Hons1A, 1A*, 1A**18-20Exemplary range and depth of attainment of intended learning outcomes+, secured by discriminating command of a comprehensive range of relevant materials and analyses, and by deployment of considered judgement relating to key issues, concepts or procedures.
 Clear (middle) first class Hons1B17
 Low first class Hons1C16
Very GoodHigh upper second class2A15Attainment of virtually all intended learning outcomes, clearly grounded on close familiarity with a wide range of supporting evidence, constructively utilised to reveal appreciable depth of understanding.
 Mid upper second class2B14
 Lower upper second class2C13
GoodHigh lower second class2D12Attainment of most of the intended learning outcomes, some more securely grasped than others, resting on a circumscribed range of evidence and displaying a variable depth of understanding.
 Mid lower second class2E11
 Low lower second class2F10
PassHigh third class3A9Acceptable attainment of some intended learning outcomes, displaying a qualified familiarity with a minimally sufficient range of relevant materials, and a grasp of the analytical issues and concepts which is generally reasonable, albeit insecure.
 Mid third class3B8
 Low third class3C7
Fail, marginalFail, marginal4A6Attainment of intended learning outcomes appreciably deficient in respect of intended learning outcomes, lacking secure basis in relevant factual or analytical dimensions.
  4B5
  4C4
Clear failClear fail5A3No convincing evidence of attainment of intended learning outcomes, such treatment of the subject as is in evidence being directionless and fragmentary.
  5B2
  5C1
No GradeNot Satisfactorily CompletedX0Failure to comply with published requirements.

+ as specified by school
Approved QEC May 09
Approved QEC May 10

No comments:

Post a Comment